Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physical Fitness Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for physical fitness professionals, athletes, trainers, and those providing health-related needs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am planning to start regular workouts in the gym and want to monitor my progress. Measuring body fat seems like a good starting point and I've already read about various methods to achieve that. I was wondering whether there is a point in measuring whole body fat when you have disproportionate body?

My case: I am a female with quite thin yet muscular upper body - narrow arms, protruding collar bone, strong back and flat belly. The lower body is also muscular but with a proper layer of fat especially around hips and thighs. By visual inspection the two parts clearly have different fat percentage (even when considering the fact that females should have some fat around hips). Is there a way to estimate body fat only for lower or upper body? Or maybe the whole body measure is sufficient? I am mainly interested in working on my lower body to achieve some balance and to monitor my progress I don't want to rely only on a mirror as the perception of my own body may change and I can get very critical at times.

share|improve this question
2  
I mean if ur gonna take the time to get skin fold calipers why not just do the full measurement –  aaronman Aug 4 '13 at 2:37
    
Measuring your own fat accurately with calipers is not possible. –  JohnP Aug 11 at 14:46

2 Answers 2

If I understand your question properly, you're asking if there's a point in measuring the whole body fat when the body is disproportionate, right?

While there are devices that focus more of the upper limbs than lower limbs and vice versa (based on the entry point for the bio-electrical impedance used for the measurement), it doesn't make much sense to have different measurements for different sections of the body.

How would this sound: "I have a 18% upper body fat measurement and a 24% lower body fat measurement"? Not only is it weird, but it's also hard to accurately measure since the measurements have to take the entire body into account.

So yeah, there's a point to whole body measurement. If you feel you want a proportionate body, focus on the areas that need more work so that everything can be even.

Thank you.

share|improve this answer
    
I wouldn't mind having 2 separate measurements for lower and upper body. If I want to monitor my progress I would be happier with the statement that I went down 3% in my lower body while the upper body stayed the same. But I see your point, thanks! –  Rabbit Aug 13 at 14:01

Dunk tests are the best (and in my opinion) only valid way to assess BF%. All of the others seem highly inaccurate.

share|improve this answer
    
All tests depend on the skill of the practitioner and the testee. If a person does not completely exhale on the dunk test it can skew the results. Dunk tanks and DXA can be the best methods, although the dunk tank needs proper administration, and the DXA calculations may not work for all cohorts. –  JohnP Aug 11 at 14:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.