Is bench press with dumbbells less effective than bench press with barbell, if so why?
|
|
Main difference is that it is not a core lift. I use it as an accessory exercise at higher volumes (10-12 rep range) to improve my bench press. |
|||
|
|
|
From my experience when Bench pressing with a good spotter will be 10 times more effective. it tends to use more of your core and also if done correctly you will see a vast improvement when training to your tri's too. You center of gravity is also better when barbell pressing and ensures a good press. I would only dumbbell press if if the bench press equipment is not capable of spotting you with a lift your self and you believe that you could be putting your self in danger. |
|||
|
|
|
In Starting Strength, a well-known book on barbell training, Mark Rippetoe says (emphasis mine):
It goes on to recommend doing the barbell version ("as the weight of history and precedent demands"), though. |
|||||
|
|
It is a different exercise. Quoting Mark Rippetoe, "(..) the dumbbell version (..) is probably a better exercise for most purposes other than powerlifting competition." (Starting Strength, p.68) He also says that getting into position, and getting up with the dumbbells after the set "is a large part of the fun", and that they require more conscious control and are harder to do compared to the barbell version. I don't see why it should be less effective, except in regard to the bench press as competitive lift. |
|||
|
|