# Is there a specific, efficient way to pedal a road bike?

I know that this may sound silly, but I was wondering if there is a proper way to pedal the road bike? I've noticed that you can be pedaling more with the front, or balls of the feet, or by staying flat for the most part, or even having the heel of your foot slightly angled down. Is there a specific way to pedal that will yield the most efficient use of 'foot power'? If so, what makes that specific technique more efficient?

-
– freiheit Mar 8 '11 at 23:00

[I will treat this from a purely mechanical point of view, as this is my area of expertise -- the actual body mechanics are much more complex, but the effect is similar.]

From a mechanical point of view, the most efficient way to propel yourself on the bike is to step on the pedal so that the distance between your heel and the pedal is maximized. Ideally this place would be your toes; however, due to the toe joints, your ability to do so is rather limited, as the the flexible joint will change the way power is transmitted through your foot.

Thus, the optimal place to step is the ball of the foot -- it has a good surface area for good contact, and the muscular mass which reduces the reaction from the pedal and dampens somewhat vibrations from the bumpy road.

As to why the most efficient place is as far from your heel as possible:

See this handy force diagram below that I found when writing my answer (image license unknown). Although not exactly what we need here, it will come in handy in the explanation.

How this whole biking deal works:

You step on the pedal with force `PF`, which creates a torque `Tc` with arm `CL', and which is transmitted through the drive train system to the real wheel, which due to its traction with the ground pushes you forward.

Mechanically, the greater the arm `CL`, the greater torque you get for a given force `PF`. They are related linearly as follows:

`Tc=PF.CL`

Simple enough?

You might be tempted to think that if you make your pedals long enough, you can exert enormous amount of force, and indeed this is so. Archimedes famously said "Give me a place to stand, and I shall move the earth with a lever". The thing is, your feet will need to travel much farther to cover the same distance as with shorter pedals -- but requiring a negligible force. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch in mechanics as well.

But wait, this only takes into account the length of the pedal, not the foot!

Indeed. Your foot only serves as an extension of the pedal, effectively increasing the torque you produce by increasing the lever length. If the length of your foot is `Lf`, then the torque will become:

`Tc=PF(CL + Lf)`

effectively increasing the torque you produce.

-
Great answer @Mindcorrosive. There's another factor that's important and that's that the positioning of your foot determines the angles of your ankle, knee and hip (assuming your stuck on the saddle). Changing these angles influences the optimal length of your muscles, which can have a significant effect on your efficiency. Furthermore, some of your muscles are biarticular (spanning two joints) and they require a certain position to be used effectively. – Ivo Flipse Mar 7 '11 at 19:12
Another thing that should be taken into consideration is that the frequency of rotation has an influence on your efficiency (of your muscles rather than mechanical). So if you were to create an extremely large lever, it would also influence your rotational speed (the longer way will take you longer) and thus might have a 'negative' influence on your efficiency. – Ivo Flipse Mar 7 '11 at 19:18
@Ivo: You are absolutely right, this is not the only factor that influences the efficiency, but is the easiest to understand and control from "user" perspective. The actual dynamics is much more complex (I did once full dynamics study of the system as a university project, differential equations and all) and the full treatment is probably more suitable for physics-SE. – mindcorrosive Mar 7 '11 at 19:24
I honestly don't expect physicists to know more about muscle physiology or anatomy ;-) But your answer is sufficient to answer the question anyway. If they want to know what the best cycling technique is, they should ask another question. – Ivo Flipse Mar 7 '11 at 19:50
I'm sorry, but I think the mechanical parts of this are all wrong. You say more torque for a given amount of force is ideal, but more torque means less distance which seems the opposite of efficient. A longer crank is mechanically equivalent to a lower gear (smaller front cog or larger rear cog), but requires more knee flex which can lead to pain or injury. A bicycle is a system with 4 levers between your feet and the road, and on most bikes 2 of those levers can be changed while riding and 1 is fairly easy to change in a shop. – freiheit Oct 8 '11 at 17:38

As I understand it, you want to expand beyond the "power stroke" and consider pedaling in a "full circle". Starting just past the top of the stroke around 1:00 you would drop your heel slightly then gradually extend you foot somewhat during the power stroke, then extend it further at the bottom, sort of "flicking" the pedal across the bottom. Then, you would pull with your hamstrings during the "back" of the stroke, driving your knee up and pulling your toes up slightly as you go to prepare for the next power stroke. At the top you would flick your foot forward then repeat the whole cycle. It is easier to understand if you attempt each of these while pedaling a bicycle. If feels pretty natural after a small amount of practice.

I would not necessarily say this is the "most efficient" way to pedal, but that it is the method that produces the most output. When Mountain Biking I use the full circle to accelerate or climb short hills. On a long hill I alternate emphasis from the power stroke to the back stroke to shift the load around while climbing. On a mostly level road I pedal full circle to maintain the maximum sustainable pace.

You can read a lot of detail here.

-

The vast majority of your power in a cycling stroke comes from your hip and knee extensors (gluteus maximus and quadriceps pushing your leg/foot down). The amount of power you can get from ankle/foot muscles relative to that is tiny; when cycling those muscles mostly just keep your foot stiff, not provide primary power.

The position of your foot on the pedal should be optimized for comfort. Don't worry about efficiency/power from your foot position relative to the pedal spindle.

With a "normal" shoe having the center of the pedal near the ball of your foot is likely the most comfortable. Your toes can't really handle the forces involved well, and pushing a pedal up into your arch is likely to be uncomfortable.

With special cycling shoes that click onto the pedal and have very stiff soles you can potentially move that contact point towards the arch or towards the toes more. Changing your foot's contact point will also require adjusting the seat and possibly the handlebars. I think that kind of millimeter level fine-tuning is something best done with the help of an experienced bike fitter, since it's easy to get it wrong in ways that can cause knee injury, saddlesores or other problems. What foot position on the cranks will get you the most power/efficiency will depend on the strength of your calves and is probably best done in a bike shop fitting setup with a power meter hooked up to your bike. But those tiny adjustments of foot position are only necessary if you really care about shaving a few seconds off the time of a multi-hour ride.

Any attempts to get angles and lengths just right for leverage are silly on a typical road bike, the cranks are only one of 4 levers and 2 of those levers can be changed in a fraction of a second while riding to fine-tune your overall ratio just right for current conditions (slope, wind, what you're trying to do, how you're feeling).

If you're concerned about efficiency, worry more about your cadence and stroke. People talk about "pedaling in circles" or "squares", but the most essential part of that is to lift your foot up on the back part of the stroke to minimize how much you're resisting the pedaling force from the other foot. Finding the right cadence is important, pushing hard in a lower cadence can wear your muscles out faster than getting the same speed/power from pushing faster in a slightly lower gear.

-

I use clipless pedals which places the ball of the foot over the pedal. Given that I've never seen biking shoes with the attachment anywhere but the ball, I'm assuming that there must be some power and/or health advantage there.

Also, keep your feet almost straight with toes pointed slightly out. In the short term, this may provide less power, but if you don't, you'll over develop your outer quads which leads to knee problems. Again, clipless pedals 'enforce' this behaviour.

-
Would you care to explain why this is the most efficient way to pedal? – Ivo Flipse Mar 7 '11 at 14:41
I do give one reason for each assertion. I'm not a kinesiologist, so that's as good as I can do for you. – Robert Gowland Mar 7 '11 at 14:54
@Ivo: Somewhat simplified explanation is that the closer to the fingers you step on the pedal, the greater the lever on which your legs exert force on the pedal. The lever is your foot; if you step on the pedal with your heel, you'll find it much more difficult to move forward. Of course the actual body mechanics is much more complex, but the resultant effect is similar. – mindcorrosive Mar 7 '11 at 15:12
@mindcorrosive a simple explanation is all that is needed to make this answer even more superb. @RobertGowland just because you're not a kinesiologist doesn't mean you can't do a little bit of research into your answer and add to it. – KronoS Mar 7 '11 at 15:15