Physical Fitness Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for physical fitness professionals, athletes, trainers, and those providing health-related needs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been wondering about this for some time now.

A LOT of diets include sweet potatoes as a source of complex carbs, which would be just fine, if I lived in US. Since I don't there aren't any available to me ( and no, it's not the price, you just CAN'T buy them).

Therefore, could the sweet potatoes be substitued with regular potatoes?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Greg Sep 12 '12 at 21:09

Questions on Physical Fitness Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physical fitness within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This question is off topic now, regarding the FAQ. – Baarn Sep 12 '12 at 18:28
up vote 8 down vote accepted

On the surface (by nutrient breakdown), they look pretty similar except that a sweet potato has massively more vitamin A. According to Dr. Mirkin:

7-ounce white potato with skin: 220 calories, 5g protein, 51g carbs, 20mg calcium, 115mg phosphorus, 2.8mg iron, 16mg sodium, 844mg potassium, 4g fiber, .22mg thiamin, .07mg riboflavin, 3.3mg niacin, 16mg vitamin C

7-ounce sweet potato: 208 calories, 3.5g protein, 49g carbs, 56mg calcium, 110mg phosphorus, 1mg iron, 20mg sodium, 693mg potassium, 5g fiber, 4350 RE vitamin A, .14mg thiamin, .13mg riboflavin, 1.2mg niacin, 49mg vitamin C.

One difference not captured in that breakdown is that the glycemic index is quite different at 85 (high) for white potato and 54 (medium) for sweet potato.

share|improve this answer
Hmm.. The glycemic index would indicate, that this substitution wouldn't be recomended, if it's weight loss one is after. – Janis Peisenieks Mar 10 '11 at 3:53
@Janis I tend to agree, since I lean low-carb/low-glycemic in my diet thinking. – Greg Mar 10 '11 at 3:56

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.