Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physical Fitness Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for physical fitness professionals, athletes, trainers, and those providing health-related needs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In bodybuilding the benefits of long muscle bellies are fairly self evident, just look at Ronnie Coleman's out of place biceps and compare them to Sergio Oliva.

For any sport requiring strength there would also be significant benefits simply due to the increased muscle mass. In the case of the legs, there seems to be a fair amount of literature showing that long achilles tendons and short calf muscle bellies are an ideal combination for runners, so there's an obvious reason why someone would have long tendons and short muscles in the lower extremeties.

I can even make a hypothesis that not having a too long bicep and having a longer tendon distally would allow for better elbow ROM. However, for the forearm, I haven't been able to find any literature, nor think of any practical benefit to having a short muscle belly and long tendons, yet some people have exactly that - a large flare right below the elbow with not much of a taper to the wrist.

Any thoughts on this topic?

share|improve this question
    
Could you explain the relation you think there is between the length of a muscle-tendon-complex and the ROM? Then I have an idea about what the answer should try to explain. –  Ivo Flipse Jun 25 '12 at 8:31
    
If your distal tendon of the bicep is so short that you can't see where the muscle ends and the tendon begins, and you flex your elbow joint, the contracted bicep will get in the way of making a very small angle. If the tendon's longer, even though flexing the elbow joint contracts the bicep, the angle's a lot smaller before the forearm comes in contact with the bicep, thereby preventing further flexion. –  Robin Ashe Jun 25 '12 at 8:36
    
How much a muscle shortens doesn't depend solely on the length of the muscle belly, but also on the location on its insertion (given it a moment around the joint), the orientation of the fibers in the muscle and the way the tendons are connected to the muscle. I'll have a look in my anatomy books to find some good images for you –  Ivo Flipse Jun 25 '12 at 8:50
    
Thanks, I look forward to seeing those diagrams. –  Robin Ashe Jun 25 '12 at 19:36
    
sorry its taking so long, but I'm currently moving and those books are in the new house already, so don't have access to it just yet. –  Ivo Flipse Jul 6 '12 at 7:52

1 Answer 1

I believe shorter muscle bellies fatigue faster and have greater explosive potential.

To get a full contraction on a short muscle belly, actin and myosin filaments have to attach, detatch, and reattach fewer times hence my belief that it would have greater explosive potential.

share|improve this answer
    
Interesting thought, but I think that would be offset by longer muscle fibers having correspondingly more binding sites. In a longer fiber, you simply have more sarcomeres per length. I would think that would argue for more sarcomeres being able to generate more power. In any case, it's simply a belief. Would make for an interesting study though. –  JohnP Sep 11 '12 at 20:58
    
What suggests that short muscle bellies have longer muscle fibers? Also think about this. Shorter sarcomeres have less distance to contract and get the job done faster. Whereas long sarcomeres are the exact opposite. Who would get done digging a large hole quicker: 100 men or 10 men? –  Grohlier Dec 11 '12 at 11:28
    
Depends on the size of the hole and how many of them are working. But if you were to ask who can get 100 holes dug faster, I think the answer is clear. –  Berin Loritsch Jul 9 '13 at 11:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.