Physical Fitness Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for physical fitness professionals, athletes, trainers, and those providing health-related needs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm attempting to understand if I should be using something other than whey (isolate) protein shake after my gym workouts (weight lifting and core strengthening).

There are lots of specific products advertised both on TV, at the gym and at the supplement store that have names like Bulk or hydroxycut as well as many, many more.

My question is: Is the science in on whether these other products have some advantage over "just" taking a straight 100% protein powder mixed with pure water?

I'm not an elite bodybuilder, just looking to stay fit an healthy and ensure I don't lose any lean muscle mass.

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

To build muscle mass you need an excess of calorie intake, over the calories you are burning. Bulking products will give you maybe 300-400 extra calories per shake in your diet which can be benefit in building muscle mass faster. However you may also put on more fat than you would with a more pure protein shake. It depends on your goals.

For strength or bodybuilding perhaps a bulking shake would be better, and for less strength orientated athletic performance a more pure shake may be preferable, hope that helps.

share|improve this answer
Yes thanks. I mainly wanted to make sure suc products were not in some way offering overall superior protein nutritional value straight after exercise. I want cut up so unlikely to use them – Anonymous Type Mar 11 '11 at 12:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.