Timeline for Aerobic vs anaerobic for better fat loss
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2017 at 2:32 | comment | added | BRogers | Summary is that anaerobic is better for sustained fat loss, but best when combined with aerobic (preferably 3 hours apart) | |
| Oct 11, 2014 at 23:35 | comment | added | LnxSlck | @EricGunnerson These calories values are taken from a polar ft4 heart band, i don't see how they can be inflated. Also, i use Endomondo app and the calories are more or less the same, so i don't see how 2 different way of counting calories would be wrong. | |
| Oct 9, 2014 at 3:38 | comment | added | Eric Gunnerson | I think your calorie burns are inflated. I doubt that you are burning more than 500 calories per hour playing soccer, and your running is also probably too much. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 10:10 | vote | accept | LnxSlck | ||
| Oct 4, 2014 at 3:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackFitness/status/518247558339383296 | ||
| Oct 3, 2014 at 19:26 | answer | added | Tony Arra | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 3, 2014 at 16:57 | answer | added | Eric | timeline score: 19 | |
| Oct 3, 2014 at 16:00 | answer | added | rrirower | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 3, 2014 at 13:48 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 4, 2014 at 0:06 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2014 at 13:47 | history | asked | LnxSlck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |