7

It's that time of year again when I am slimming down (reduce body fat %) to show off my hard work. I'm looking for an effective way to increase my calorie burning during a routine. I picked up a 40lbs weight vest for christmas and I wanted to know if adding the vest will help increase the rate at which calories are burned during walking/running, cardio, etc.

My question is, will adding the weight vest to my routine aid in reducing overall body fat % in a way that is worth while?

Edited to rephrase my question

  • 4
    I'll bet the trainer told her to stop wearing the vest while running in order to minimize joint damage. That's not necessarily a bad idea, but it doesn't have anything to do with effectiveness for fat loss. – Dave Liepmann Apr 2 '13 at 21:56
  • @DaveLiepmann That's a good point on that note. – DustinDavis Apr 2 '13 at 22:09
  • I don't think just walking around with a weight vest is enough to cause some major fat loss (eg. see this question on ankle weights). Weight vests are usually used to make bodyweight movements harder (eg. pull-ups, dips, any exercise where it's hard to decrease leverage). – VPeric Apr 3 '13 at 10:40
  • Don't you just want to look at tweaking diet? – Megasaur Apr 13 '13 at 6:30
  • @Megasaur my question is specific to using a weight vest to increase calorie usage during activities/workouts. Nothing to do with diets. – DustinDavis Apr 13 '13 at 19:19
3

Yes using a weight vest will make you burn more calories while running. Much like a heavier person burns more calories than a lighter person doing the same movement at the same intensity so too using the weight vest will help you burn more calories. In essence the vest is making you a heavier person. this means you will have to work harder to do any activity that you normally do at your own body weight.

  • Your calories per mile would certainly go up -- I know I burn more calories when hiking with a 40-pound overnight pack than with a two-pound belt pouch -- but do your calories per hour go up? With the aforementioned belt pouch, I cover about four miles per hour, but only around two per hour with the pack. – Mark Jun 27 '16 at 23:07
  • I think logic would dictate that if the calories burned increases overall, then it would also have an effect on the calories burned per hour. – usedToBeFat Jul 29 '16 at 17:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.