I've heard a theory that it is better to stretch muscles while they are (lightly?) engaged. The reason was said to be that muscle engagement will cause the muscles themselves, rather than the tendons, to stretch.

I've not been able to find any information about this online. Does someone have more information which supports or refutes this theory?

  • 4
    You're looking for "active isolated stretching". Jan 30 '15 at 5:54
  • AIS is closer to ballistic type of stretching, you may also be looking for PNF stretching. Here's a decent Honors thesis on the various types of stretching with their impact on power, injuries, etc. digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/…
    – JohnP
    Jan 30 '15 at 16:08
  • Growing up as a long distance runner, I always was told that ballistic stretching can cause tearing. Personally, I only stretch when warmed up, but I never engage my muscles. Nov 18 '16 at 13:54

Engaging a muscle will increase the stretch on the tendon and decrease the stretch on the muscle. PNF and other techniques alternate between contracting and relaxing a muscle to overcome the "stretch reflex" and allow your tissues to lengthen more.

There can be value to contracting muscles at the "end range" of their range of motion. This is more like going through the full active range of motion on exercises, like all the way down on a push-up. This can help mobility but it isn't stretching. If you are still looking for more info on gently contracting a muscle when it is being stretched look up "end range loading".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.