1

I've been running through a new arm routine the last few weeks and seeing some decent results. The way the routine is setup is biceps, triceps then wrists/forearm.

My question is if I should be doing a bicep exercise, then a tricep exercise and alternate or if I should just do all the bicep exercises and then all the tricep exercises which is what I've been doing.

Or, does it even matter?

1
  • 1
    I'd be interested in a science based answer to this one. I've got some opinions but I'd be interested in something more solid.
    – Eric
    Apr 11 '15 at 2:48
1

I don’t know that this has ever been studied. That may be because there are many factors involved in “seeing some decent results”, the least of which, may be the order of the exercises. However, if you frame it in the context of whether the biceps or the triceps needs more improvement, or, whether your goal is big arms, then, order may make a difference.

For example, if your goal is big arms, you should look at training triceps first since they make up about two-thirds of your arm mass. Training them early on in your routine will allow you to attack the muscle with more energy and intensity. If, however, your biceps are the weak link, training them first should help. In either scenario, other individual factors (nutrition, genetics, commitment, etc.) are involved that will combine to form the basis for any potential results you receive.

The most important factor, in my opinion, is variety. Switching up your training (ie. alternating the order occasionally) affords you the opportunity to develop a more balanced physique. So, to answer your question, the order will matter only if you think it does.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.