# Interpreting descriptions of sets

Many strength training programs describe sets something like this:

3 sets 8-10 reps, 10-12 reps, 13-15 reps

I'm not sure what this actually means. Does it mean, 8-10, 8-10, 8-10 (drop the weight here) then 10-12, 10-12, 10-12 (drop the weight again) 13-15, 13-15, 13-15?

Or does it mean 8-10, 10-12, 13-15 (drop the weight here); 8-10, 10-12, 13-15 (drop the weight again); 8-10, 10-12-13-15

Or does it mean something completely different?

UPDATE:

To clarify, what I want to know is this: Do you do three of the first range, three of the second range, three of the third range OR Do you do three of all three ranges, three of all three ranges, three of all three ranges? (In both scenarios a total of 9 sets will occur)

• Since this is answered, I'll leave a comment - that means, to me, one set with reps in the first range, one set with reps in the second range, one set with reps in the third range. You adjust weight as necessary so you are able to do the number of reps within the range of the sets, hopefully just barely. So, for my imaginary bench press workout, first set with 145 lbs, 13 - 15 reps; second set, 155 lbs 10-12 reps; third set is 165 lbs, 8-10 reps. Aug 11 '16 at 18:32

• Ah, I should mention that I'm not really asking about the ranges themselves, they were just chosen arbitrarily and dropping the weight/increasing it is something that I saw was a common factor among programs. What I'm actually asking is what is the order in which they're done. If you look back at the question, you can see that what I'm trying to find out is if you do: `three of all ranges`, `three of all ranges`, `three of all ranges` OR `three of first range`, `three of second range`, `three of third`. Aug 10 '16 at 22:11