2

I was on about 87 kg to 88 kg. With my height of 1,94 m, it was pretty damn good in terms of my BMI :) I nearly hit exactly the middle of the target value of a mid-twenty male. However, I started to train for a run a few weeks ago. I'm running nearly every second day (8 to 11 km) and do a few push-ups (20) and sit-ups (30) twice per day.

I noticed that I've gained about 3 kg! Okay, I just would've thought "Yep, have to be the additional muscles" but it concerns me, that my BMI is out of range. Is the BMI reliable when it comes to added muscle mass? Should I try to stay in the target range regardless of the training?

  • 3
    BMI is a terrible measure and doesn't account for bodyfat percentage. – cbll Aug 18 '16 at 8:52
  • Gaining 3kg in weight in a few weeks is unlikely. That's probably just regular day to day variation, or inaccuracy in the scales. ie had you eaten or drunk a lot before you weighed yourself? – vclaw Aug 18 '16 at 10:09
  • No, BMI is pretty bad if you fall outside the very average range of "average," and does not take into account different frames and is worthless if you have much of any muscular development. According to BMI, Bruce Smith, the NFL great, would have been morbidly obese at 6'4" and 280 lbs, even though he was about 6% body fat at the time. – PoloHoleSet Aug 18 '16 at 18:32
4

No, do not use BMI to gauge your fitness level.

First of all, and I love pointing this out; the person who invented the BMI scale said that it should NOT be used to indicate the level of fatness in a person.

Second of all, it was invented between 1830 and 1850. Our knowledge of the human body has evolved so much now, that it's a marvel that it's still being used.

BMI categories are generally regarded as a tool for measuring whether sedentary individuals are underweight, overweight or obese with various exceptions, such as: athletes, children, the elderly, and the infirm.

Look at that list of exceptions.

The term "athletes" in this regard is really anyone who actively works out.

Sources and extra reading:

| improve this answer | |
2

BMI is just an average target, being healthy and fit varies per person. I used to be really underweight according to BMI measurements while feeling fine and working out almost daily (cycling, running) and eating properly.

I've started doing weight training about 2 years ago and gained about 20kg (44lbs) in muscle, and according to BMI I am now your average joe, even thought I'm very muscular, and able to do things that most people in my gym cannot.

What I'm trying to point out is that BMI isn't a 100% accurate measurement. Gaining a couple of pounds/kg is a good thing, don't let it put you off. You are getting healthier from doing a mix of cardio and weight training, that's for damn sure.

| improve this answer | |
0

The respondanse have been correct, B.M.I is a flawed way of measuring fat to bone/muscle. Hip to waist measurements provide far a better idea of how much fat you carry. More sophisticated techniques give accurate measurements but are costly. What to do??? Not always easy to do, but simple to quantify, use more calories in exercise than consumed by mouth will ALWAYS do the job. A more simple take home message " Don't eat it if it takes too much effort to burn off" David W Cornwall

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.