8

enter image description here

Jefferson Curls as illustrated in the video is preached as good exercise for injury prevention and relief for back pain as well as flexibility exercise.

From reading around sport forums it seems a decently popular exercise for rugby.

Why isn't it performed more commonly in the gym? Looks like a perfect exercise for building spinal erectors.

  • 2
    Does it look like a perfect exercise for building spinal erectors? It looks to me like a perfect exercise to break the spine. I’m not so advanced as to be able to calculate it, but I imagine that the shearing forces are ridiculous here. – JustSnilloc Jun 21 at 23:04
  • 3
    @JustSnilloc: It is not so much the shearing forces that are dangerous here—by definition, shearing forces are highest when the load is perpendicular to the alignment of the intervertebral discs—it is the intradiscal pressure on the posterior walls of the discs that is of potential concern. However, with an appropriately sub-maximal load, there is no reason that this exercise cannot be performed safely. – POD Jun 22 at 4:36
8

The common practice stems from the widespread-but-fallacious belief that loaded spinal flexion inherently causes injury, and this belief originates largely from studies of intradiscal pressure in standing, seated, or otherwise spinally-flexed positions of untrained individuals. It is often assumed that we should avoid any and all flexion, extension, or rotation whilst loading our spines—that we should lift very straight and mechanically. And this is true when we are speaking about maximal and near-maximal lifting. However, this simplistic view of the spine fails to account for the fact that it is designed to articulate under load, and that it is quite capable of doing so healthfully within a range of loads.

Virtually all sports and activities involve some degree of simultaneous flexion/extension and rotation under load, and those actions are critical to their performance. Running, jumping, ducking, weaving, changing directions, tumbling, grappling, and throwing—all of these would be impossible without multi-planar movement of the spine under load. And since performance sports all demand these actions, it follows that they can and should be trained.

The caveat is the degree to which the spine can safely be flexed, extended, and/or rotated under load, and of course, the amount that it can thereby be loaded. The greater the angle of flexion, extension, or rotation of the spine, the greater the stresses—axial, shear, and rotational—that compound on the intervertebral discs. High degrees of flexion or extension, particularly, cause high intradiscal pressures (hydrostatic pressure measured in the nucleus pulposus) to act against the disc wall that is under tension. Hence, the closer that our training load approaches our maximum for any given lift, the less we should allow our spine to deviate from neutral. However, the deep spinal muscles of the interspinales, intertransversarii, rotatores, and multifidus combine with the superficial erector spinae and ‘core’ muscles to counteract these stresses. Thus, we can safely assume that if we train these structures sensibly, it will reduce the likelihood of future injury.

Thus, loaded appropriately—that is, not loaded excessively—the Jefferson curl can be an excellent exercise for stretching and strengthening the posterior spine. Since it involves a large degree of spinal flexion, however, the load used should be low—perhaps a maximum of a quarter or third of our deadlift one-repetition maximum. And it is implicit, therefore, that this exercise is more appropriate for training the deep spinal extensors than the large superficial extensors of the erector spinae.

I hope that helps.

| improve this answer | |
  • I would definitely not advice this exercise to beginners though. It's only an excellent exercise when done right, it's disastrous when done wrong and incredibly easy to do wrong, IMO. – Mast Jun 22 at 13:17
  • 2
    @Mast: A stand-and-reach stretch is essentially a lightly-loaded Jefferson curl. As soon as we hold any kind of load, it becomes a Jefferson curl. Loaded excessively, we might herniate a disc. If we load a squat excessively, we might not only herniate a disc; we might break our spine. Yet squatting is commonly (and rightly) assumed to be safe for beginners, but a Jefferson curl is not because we wrongly assume spinal flexion inherently to be dangerous. It is not. The safety of any lift is a matter of good judgement and degree. – POD Jun 22 at 14:48
  • @Mast: I take your point, however, and I have appended a qualification to the summary to emphasise the need for moderation in selecting our load. Thank you for your comment. – POD Jun 22 at 22:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.