Physical Fitness Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for physical fitness professionals, athletes, trainers, and those providing health-related needs. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
When doing work out with weights, what is the impact of trade-off between
For example, I can repeat an exercise 10x3 times with 20kg weights but only 7X3 times with 25kg weights. What will be the difference of these two exercises on the body?
Your goals and your current level of progress determine the number of sets and reps.
Training for strength, power, endurance and hypertrophy all require a different number of sets and reps:
This is well explained by a chart in the article I linked to:
Three sets of 7 at 25kg will demand and develop more strength than three sets of 10 at 20kg would. The sets of 10 would promote greater hypertrophy and require more strength-endurance and conditioning. The difference is not going to be terribly significant, however, since 7 and 10 aren't too far apart.
Doing fewer reps with heavier weights requires and develops more strength and less conditioning than more reps with somewhat lighter weights. Doing more reps with slightly lighter weights may, in some circumstances, for some exercises, produce more hypertrophy (mass gain). Fewer heavier reps is better for strength; more reps (but still as heavy as possible) is better for size.
Though the original on page 60 of Rippetoe & Kilgore's Practical Programming is better (the gradations from range to range are less stark) this chart from reddit does an excellent job explaining the effects of different rep schemes:
Doing fewer repetitions with heavier weights builds strength most effectively. Doing more repetitions (circa 4 to 12), with weight that is still challenging, builds mass most efficiently. Doing more than 12 repetitions in a single set is generally best for endurance as opposed to strength. (See this answer for more information.) Does this mean that someone who is diligent with a 12-rep program can't get strong? Heck no! People get strong with 12-rep sets all the time. But if raw strength is their goal, they could probably achieve that goal faster with sets of, say, 3 or 6.
A novice generally does best with a focus on strength and some hypertrophy. Three sets of five or five sets of five are the two most common set/rep schemes. The weight must be heavy enough to make more than 5 sets very difficult.
Note that there is very little about these rep ranges in and of themselves that produces desired attributes. It is how these rep ranges relate to elements of training such as volume, intensity (that is, proximity to 1RM), and muscular exhaustion that determines the effects of training. Notice also that hypertrophy produces strength and power, and strength and endurance enable hypertrophy.
The following "map", from the Starting Strength site, explains the relationship of this volume-to-purpose relationship to sports. It refers to the three metabolic pathways: phosphagenic, glycolytic, and oxidative. The phosphagenic pathway is used when we do a very small number of reps in a set (3 or less, whereas higher-rep sets use the glycolytic pathway (approximately 4 to 12, though it depends on how vigorously one is working out). The oxidative pathway is for even higher rep ranges (e.g. 20), and is more commonly associated with longer duration, repetitive exercise like distance running or bicycling. It is explained in more detail in this article.
