10

Various weightlifting and exercise resources either claim that ATG squats (a**-to-ground, i.e. as low as you can) are perfectly fine or claim they will destroy your knees in two sessions.

I was wondering if anyone has any insight as to what is going on here. Will a properly performed (weighted) squat that brings legs below parallel to the ground have any greater negative impact on the knees or other joints compared to parallel squats?

Lets assume for a moment we aren't talking about competitive weightlifting weights, so with a squat weight smaller than 1.5x your body mass.

Personally I side with the "it won't do anything wrong" side, considering that

  1. With bar weight at approximately your body mass you could exchange the bar with squatting on one leg, i.e. this is strain your body is "designed" to be able to withstand.
  2. If you assume that there is the possibility of excess joint strain, you would be seeing epidemic levels of knee injuries among competitive weightlifters, who routinely go below parallel in the clean&jerk, with much greater weight, and while weightlifters can get various joint injuries, I haven't seen anything demonstrating that injuries are more biased towards the knee.
| improve this question | |
  • 4
    possible duplicate of How deep should a squat be? – Nathan Wheeler Mar 14 '11 at 19:22
  • As long as the crease of your hip is lower than your knee than you are low enough. There are lot of muscular guys doing pitiful squats out there. Low squats HURT! Thats why no one wants to do them. – Mike S Aug 13 '12 at 23:41
  • 1
    "What is the joint impact of ATG squats" is quite a different question from "how deep should someone squat". I think those voting to close should reconsider. If you think either question is being neglected then consider adding an answer. – Dave Liepmann Aug 13 '13 at 2:49
  • True, retracting. – Baarn Aug 13 '13 at 10:01
10

The majority of studies show that squatting just below parallel is perfectly safe and in fact, even beneficial to the knee. However, there is a difference between just breaking parallel and squatting until your hamstrings hit your calves (ATG). My personal opinion is that even ATG squatting is safe for the knees and studies of weightlifters - who squat as deep as humanly possible - generally confirm this.

However, there are some studies that show increased risk of knee injury from very deep squatting. Even more importantly, the benefits from going ATG vs. just below parallel aren't huge for most goals/activities and not many people have the flexibility to do so while maintaining a proper lumbar arch. Therefore, while I'd always recommend squatting below parallel, I'd only suggest ATG squatting if your goals directly benefit from it, with olympic weight lifting being the primary use case.

For your reading pleasure:

| improve this answer | |
  • I changed the second link to a (hopefully) similar article from the same site as it was subject to link rot. Always consider this problem when writing answers, content on the Internet is pretty volatile. – Baarn Oct 12 '12 at 7:54
1

All I can recommend is to try it out and see, I often do squats like this. I never called them ATG Squats though, its the first time I have seen the term ATG Squat to me it was just a very deep squat.

Will it cause injury to your knees I am not sure, performing squats is all about technique. If you get the technique wrong then the chances of injury are high.

As mentioned by @md5sum How deep should a squat be?.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.