Timeline for Wide grip pull-ups vs "normal" pull-ups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 at 9:27 | history | edited | HerrKaputt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed dead link to point to Wayback Machine archive
|
| Aug 8, 2014 at 9:25 | comment | added | HerrKaputt | Yeah, the forum was closed a while ago and I thought the posts were lost. I have TXT versions of my own big posts but didn't have time to transform them into posts here (by the way, can you tell me how to do that?). Fortunately the Wayback Machine crawled them, this one in particular is available here. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 21:03 | comment | added | claws | link to your article is dead | |
| Dec 12, 2012 at 7:29 | vote | accept | zero-divisor | ||
| Dec 12, 2012 at 7:28 | comment | added | zero-divisor | I've read the entire paper now. As you already stated, the essence is that there is a significant difference (in EMG activation) between pronated and supinated grip, but no significant difference between wide grip and narrow grip (lat pull downs). | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 15:54 | comment | added | HerrKaputt | First of all, +1 for not being scared of reading a paper! Yes, that paper is very close to your question, although (as I mention in my post) they look at the lat pull-down instead of the pull-up, since it is easier to control other experimental variables (electrode placement, etc). Unfortunately I only have access to the abstract, but it is enough to answer your question. | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 14:51 | comment | added | zero-divisor | Thanks for this. The pubmed-paper you mentioned in your post seems to address exactly my question. | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 13:56 | history | answered | HerrKaputt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |