Timeline for Impact of cardio-exercise duration on burned calories
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013 at 17:28 | answer | added | Hotaka | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 9:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackFitness/status/380621556487315456 | ||
| Sep 18, 2013 at 16:30 | answer | added | JohnP♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 20:46 | comment | added | Baarn | I tried to find said calculator and only found calculators that had "Running / Walking (running part less than 10min)" as an option, I might as well confused that. And of course, I would accept a no as an answer, too. | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 20:24 | comment | added | JohnP♦ | Are you sure that it was less than 10 minutes of exercise, and not less than 10 minutes per mile? If you run at a given pace, there is no magical shift in metabolism that occurs at 10 minutes. And no, there isn't going to be a real difference between 3x10 minutes at X pace and 30 minutes at X pace. The only reason to do that would be fitness (i.e. you could run 7 minute miles in 3x10 min segments with 1 minute rest, but you couldn't run 30 minutes straight at 7 minute miles) | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 15:06 | history | edited | Baarn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2013 at 14:50 | comment | added | Baarn | This question reminded me of that calculator. I've never used that specific calculator again, if necessary I will try to find it anyway. (But maybe that's not needed) | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 14:48 | history | asked | Baarn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |