Timeline for Should one replace burned calories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 at 3:36 | answer | added | Eric Gunnerson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 21:07 | vote | accept | Jared Beach | ||
| Mar 6, 2014 at 19:04 | answer | added | JohnP♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 18:15 | comment | added | Kneel-Before-ZOD | Without replacing the calories, can you perform your day-to-day functions properly? If you can, I don't see a reason to replace it. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 17:28 | comment | added | Jared Beach | Above comment removed The Pareto principle (also known as the 80–20 rule, the law of the vital few, and the principle of factor sparsity) states that, for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. - I don't quite understand the reference to this rule. Are you saying that I should be satisfied with the idea that I'm losing weight when I'm in a calorie deficit? | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 17:16 | history | edited | Jared Beach | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammer
|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 17:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 7, 2014 at 3:33 | |||||
| Mar 6, 2014 at 16:46 | history | asked | Jared Beach | CC BY-SA 3.0 |