Timeline for Kettlercise, calories burnt
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://fitness.stackexchange.com/ with https://fitness.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 9:49 | comment | added | Julii Brainard | Thanks for replies. .....It looks very boring, costs money, I have history of RSI in my forearms, so Kettlebells probably not good for me. I just wondered if those calorie expenditure values could be true for something that doesn't look that tiring..... I had my VO2MAX lab-tested 10 yrs ago. Assuming an avg % decline for my age, my VO2Max should still be around 44-I forget the units, but anyway, close enough. My husband had his VO2MAX done 10 yrs ago & again 3.5yrs ago (both lab -treadmill etc) and his hadn't changed at all in the intervening time. | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 19:58 | comment | added | JohnP♦ | How did you obtain the value for your "good estimate of your real VO2max"? | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 18:57 | answer | added | user5823815 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 7:25 | comment | added | Eric | Do some snatches and swings with a 53lb kb, and then check that effort against a 12 minute mile. | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 0:09 | comment | added | Alex L | Kettlebell exercises are probably too complex of movements to fit into that formula. Plus there's some degree of anaerobic work going on with these types of movements. | |
| Feb 7, 2016 at 20:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 7, 2016 at 20:23 | |||||
| Feb 7, 2016 at 20:11 | history | asked | Julii Brainard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |