Timeline for Calculated heart rate versus actual heart rate
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2023 at 19:14 | comment | added | Michael Curtis | Yes. That's in my question. And the part "168 and 176 are close, but..." explains why I would ask in the first place. | |
| Mar 10, 2023 at 15:31 | answer | added | JohnP♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 10, 2023 at 15:15 | comment | added | Thomas Markov♦ | And do you think that targeting 168 vs 176 might make the difference between losing your fitness and maintaining it? | |
| Mar 10, 2023 at 15:10 | comment | added | Michael Curtis | In other words I don't want to loose my running improvements from the summer while waiting out the winter with no running. I'm trying to maintain or improve my cardio level over the winter. | |
| Mar 10, 2023 at 13:57 | comment | added | Michael Curtis | Last summer my pace for a 2 mile run was 8 min. per mile. I don't run in the winter so I'm doing the burpees inside. I would like to start up running again when the weather is warm, and have my 1 mile pace at least maintained at 8 min. or improved. | |
| Mar 10, 2023 at 0:07 | comment | added | Thomas Markov♦ | What are your goals here? It's hard to make any sort of recommendations without knowing what your overall objective is. | |
| Mar 9, 2023 at 21:52 | history | asked | Michael Curtis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |