Timeline for Is there an optimum for swimming stroke rate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2012 at 16:42 | history | edited | FredrikD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added definition of function
|
| Oct 5, 2012 at 8:22 | history | edited | FredrikD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added own data
|
| Oct 4, 2012 at 19:46 | history | edited | FredrikD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added diagram and more text about freg vs length, clear text
|
| Oct 4, 2012 at 14:20 | history | edited | FredrikD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added m/stroke calculation
|
| Sep 13, 2012 at 13:42 | vote | accept | spinodal | ||
| S Sep 11, 2012 at 11:01 | history | suggested | charlie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Incorrectly stated 0.85 to be a "faster stroke rate" than 0.96. In fact it's "slower".
|
| Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 11, 2012 at 11:01 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2012 at 14:43 | comment | added | JohnP♦ | Just wanted to add that you can "artificially" lower your stroke rate by extending the glide phase, but that's not really accomplishing what you want. As you get more efficient with your stroke, your rate will naturally lower. If you would really like to improve, then you may need to take some lessons. Swimming is extremely technique driven, so once you get as fast as your fitness will allow, any further improvements will have to come from stroke refinement. | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 14:15 | history | answered | FredrikD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |