Recently I encountered a leg press machine that works in the reverse direction than a typical leg press machine. Instead of pushing the weights forward with your legs you push your seat backwards which is attached to weights. It is more like a calf raise machine but it was clear from the instructions on the machine that it is for leg press. I am avoiding squats because I have spine issues (yes the jury is still out for the leg press machine on that issue as well but that’s not related to my question at the moment).
Basically this machine works like a horizontal squat with a seat. My question is considering various types of leg muscles and glut involved does it matter which direction you are pushing? Probably the same question can be asked for other devices such as pull-ups vs dumbbells for biceps, etc. What I noticed in the past was pull-ups built a lot more of my brachioradialis than my biceps. That’s why I am skeptical that the distribution of muscles affected will be the same for two different leg press machines as the movement direction seems to build the muscle more that is attached to the bone that remains static as opposed to the one attached to the bone in motion. Or at least the percentages will be different if both bones are moving.
I am looking for some references to studies on this matter.